Mark Dankof's Catacomb

Just another weblog

Posts Tagged ‘zionism

The Tehran Times Talks to Mark Dankof on JCPOA, Trump, Bolton, and Empire


Mohammad Marzari of the Tehran Times sits down with American paleo-conservative broadcaster and columnist Mark Dankof to discuss JCPOA, Donald Trump, John Bolton, and the waning character of the American Empire. 

Tehran Times: The UN Security Council has rejected the US proposal to extend the Iran arms embargo. In this regard Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) has said that “It wasn’t a defeat. It was a rout.” Is that such a catastrophic result for the U.S.?

Mark Dankof: It was a deserved rout and an absolute embarrassment and foreign policy catastrophe for the United States. I am among those on the American Right who supported, and still support JCPOA. Pat Buchanan and David Stockman are two other examples, Stockman having written an outstanding defense of the treaty in several places. He has also rightly attacked Trump for the Soleimani Assassination.


Mark Dankof’s youthful view of the Elburz Mountains from Golestan 4 in North Tehran in the Pahlavi Era.

Some of my own past remarks are still relevant for Tehran Times readers at the Tasnim News Agency on several subjects and at Charles Bausman’s Russia Insider.


Vladimir Putin:  Iran and Russia are Powerful Allies in the Fight Against International Terrorism. Tehran Times photo.

In the end, the UN Security Council members know that the treaty is solid, undermined by the Israeli Lobby’s control of the foreign policy of the United States regardless of which political party is in power, and an agreement where the illegitimate unilateral withdrawal of the Trump Administration from the deal is the breaking of the American word of honor not only to Iran but the other signatories. The notion that the United States insists it can continue to dictate policies on Iran and the JCPOA terms having withdrawn as a party to the deal is especially outlandish, and an insistence no one else outside of Mr. Trump’s Zionist entourage is buying.

Tehran Times: How do you assess Trump’s “maximum pressure” policy? Was it successful?

Mark Dankof: It is an obvious failure. The Europeans are increasingly disenchanted with Washington’s Zionist war drum beating, and the “maximum pressure” approach is simply and understandably strengthening the Russian and Chinese political and economic relationship with Iran at American expense.


Mark Dankof on Trump’s Zionist Problem for Press TV.

Tehran Times: Do you think that the rest of world including the European countries will cooperate with Trump’s administration to ruin the nuclear deal by triggering “snapback” sanctions on Iran?


Mark Dankof in the usual reading and studying mode.

Mark Dankof: With the exception of the UK, I believe the other European powers will balk at this idea. The German resistance to illegitimate American interference with the Nord Stream 2 deal with Russia is both an example of a reassessment of post-war American dictation of policy to Europe, a situation that will exacerbate resentment of American dictation on Iran policy and JCPOA, and eventually force a reassessment of NATO and Neo-Conservative militarism toward Russia in the post Cold War world where the Reagan-Bush I pledges to Gorbachev have been systematically broken in the same way that the American promises on JCPOA have been. It is beginning to dawn on Europeans that the Zionist Neo-Conservative foreign policy on both Iran and Putin’s Russia makes them more vulnerable and far less secure. It is my hope that a comatose American electorate eventually figures this out in terms of their own self interest and national security.


Syrian Christians are among the Zionist victims of war and subversion.

Tehran Times: On May 8, 2018, the United States withdrew from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA–the nuclear deal) unilaterally while Iran was committed to its obligations. Now Trump tries to use the deal to unite the other signatories against Iran? What kind of logic is that?

Mark Dankof: There is no logical rationale whatsoever for this counterproductive lunacy. It must be understood in terms of the Israeli Lobby stranglehold on American Presidential Administrations, Congress, and Mainstream Media (MSM) in the United States. Trump is perhaps the worst example of this yet, in terms of an absolute blank check being issued to Israel on Gaza, Lebanon, the Occupied Territories, and East Jerusalem. This is not changed by the 2020 election year fraud of the American-brokered “deal” between Israel and the UAE which does nothing for the Palestinians at all. Netanyahu admitted that his annexation policies are “still on the table.” You can be assured they will reappear after the first Tuesday in November in the United States.


Tehran Times: Do you expect that America will recognize the reality of a multi-polar world?

Mark Dankof: I do not believe that this reality has yet dawned on an American National Security and foreign policy establishment drenched in false notions of Empire, and false doctrines of American and Israeli Exceptionalism. A $26 trillion dollar national debt, the rise of competing economies and military establishments around the world, and an American domestic scene mired in more political and cultural division than I’ve ever witnessed in my lifetime, suggest the obvious end of the post WW II American Empire for reasons similar to the end of the old British Empire and the dissolution of the USSR. But the American political oligarchy seems presently oblivious to this obvious reality.


Tehran Times: What about former American Ambassador to the UN and ex-Trump National Security Advisor John Bolton, and his advocacy of a “maximum pressure” policy on Iran, as he expressed this in his recent interview with the BBC?


John Bolton with his Zionist War Party fans at the Republican Jewish Coalition.  Times of Israel photo.

Mark Dankof:  “John Bolton is an Apostle of World Zionism, the Israeli Government, and the Israeli Lobby solely interested in a war for Netanyahu and Neo-Conservative Regime Change in Iran. He approves of the Soleimani Assassination and Marxist MEK terror operations in Iran and from the latter’s Troll Farm in Albania. His ideas, if implemented, would likely ignite World War III. Innocent Americans would die alongside innocent Iranians and others. It is not illegitimate to tag him as a war criminal with a psychopathic psychological profile. He is, simply put, a dangerous man.”


The Evil of The Empire is no Longer Concealed by Its Captains and Kings: The COVID-19 Sanctions on Iran


Mark Dankof’s rooftop view of the Elburz Mountains north of Tehran in another lifetime.

     The evil of the American Empire and its long-standing alliance with the Zionism and Globalism of the New World Order is nothing new to me. After all, I’ve spent a lot of time broadcasting for RBN, Rense Radio, and the Andrew Carrington Hitchcock “Generations” show on these matters for an awfully long time. Since 9-11, I’ve also been a quasi-regular on Iran’s Press TV, even as I have been writing on this same dreadful subject for the American Free Press, Don Wassall’s The Nationalist Times, SARTRE’s BATR News, the Tasnim News Agency, the Fars News Agency, and Russia Insider.


Syria: Assad and Putin have checked the advance of the New World Order as the Zio-American Empire becomes desperate and recklessly dangerous.


     All these years in my Night Thoughts, certain articles come back to me in the wee hours when sleep is sometimes elusive. Kourosh Ziabari’s interview with me on 9-11 is one; a second is my treatise on FDR and Pearl Harbor. A few years ago, the late Michael Collins Piper really loved my essay on a dying America entitled “Why We’re Finished.” Another of more recent vintage is my work for Russia Insider and Russian Faith on Christian Martyrdom, the American Empire, and the New World Order. As I contemplate these, my tribute to the late Marquis J. McCants, and my observations about the American Empire at the time of the death of Chris Kyle, the so-called American Sniper come flooding back as well.


Bringing the humanity of Iran into focus: Do Trump, Pompeo, Mnuchin, and Dubowitz really want to eradicate such people?

     Two events since the advent of the New Year make all of this older paper trail seem like a millennium ago. The first is the extra judicial assassination of General Qassem Soleimani on January 3rd. The second is the proliferation of the COVID-19 virus globally, and the appalling American maintenance and intensification of sanctions on Iran in its devastating wake. Two articles which best contextualize the latter tragedy are those of Kevin Barrett for the Unz Review and Philip Giraldi for the same. Giraldi argues effectively that these sanctions on Iran constitute “crimes against humanity.” Without plagiarizing, I coincidentally chose the same words in a recent brief interview for Press TV.


The demonic countenance of Mark Dubowitz, Israel’s front man at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.

     Perhaps the most revealing example of the Israeli-driven role in these American crimes against Iran is one Mark Dubowitz of the Israeli-linked Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD). Again, Kevin Barrett and Philip Giraldi provide the context and the analysis necessary in our understanding that American crimes against humanity are largely those driven by the Zionist juggernaut. Democracy in this Orwellian world is defined as anything that the Israeli government wants, and what the Israeli Lobby wants both in Palestine and the Middle East generally, as well as in the American domestic scene and globally. Syria, Venezuela, Ukraine, and Russia are immediately added to the mix. 

     The end game is World Government ruled by the Beast who sits on his throne in the 3rd Temple. The Apostle Paul outlines this aspect of the eschatological context of these events in 2 Thessalonians 2. The proclamation reported recently in Israel National News underscores the increasing speed with which these events are transpiring.  Yes, it will happen, but with a far different outcome from that envisioned by the Zionist settler and Temple movements in Israel and their “Christian” Zionist allies driven by the prophetic school of thought known as Dispensationalism,


Another human face attached to Zio-COVID-19 sanctions on Iran. The death of a 25 year old nurse on the front lines without proper equipment and supplies.

     As I stated at the beginning, Zio American Empire crimes are not new. What is new is that the unapologetically public character of these crimes without even resorting to the shopworn doctrine of “plausible deniability” has reached a new level of outrageousness. In the case of Iran, the crime of the assassination of General Soleimani, has now mushroomed into the attempt to achieve Zio-Regime Change in Iran via mass murder. Dr. Trita Parsi pointedly asks on Twitter, “What kind of a person looks at a country suffering from a pandemic and thinks ‘This is the time to bomb them’?  Answer: Mike Pompeo.”


The Final Zio-Solution for Iran if COVID-19 Sanctions Fail?

     Our short term call to action on behalf of the Iranian people seems anemic but doable. Call the White House, your Senators, your Congressional Representative and the State Department. Join 80 Hours for 80 Million immediately and post it to everyone you know via social media. Tag all your social media correspondence on this matter with #EndCovidSanctionsNow. And keep after the known faces of the Zio Establishment on this issue. Tag them with their earned responsibility for this human tragedy. The ADL, the FDD, and AIPAC are but a few to target.


     On a longer term basis, the warnings to the American people of Ron Paul and John W. Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute are apropos. The Zio Establishment is using COVID-19 as their opportunity for their biggest power grabs since the Kennedy Assassination and 9-11. The police state is here. It is advancing daily. Be aware. Be vigilant.


     But the good news is this: The COVID-19 virus is stressing out the Zio American Empire to the virtual breaking point. Mark Dubowitz speaks of using COVID-19 as the weapon against Iran achieving what sanctions before now have not. He and his ilk fail to see that this is a dagger aimed at their entire criminal enterprise.


Who needs a caption for this one?

     The fraud of economic outsourcing, evidenced by the American pharmaceutical industry presently housed in China, is a threat to the national security of the United States, even as Iran is not. The fraud of demographic manipulation, open borders, MSM Fake News, stock market bubbles, gun confiscation, worthless Zio Wars and a burgeoning national debt are becoming increasingly obvious to victimized Americans and Europeans.


Press TV’s Serena Shim was a Lebanese-American assassinated by the Erdogan regime, with the silence of her own government deafening.

     And when the dots are connected, people will rise up against the Beast and put him out of business. Greater Israel will be finished; the Fed and Central Banking will be finished; Zio Wars will have run out of manpower, money, and ideological enthusiasts. Sovereign nation states will return in history; and the American Republic will arise from the ashes of the Evil Empire.


     As I said in my promo for the RBN show on NBR scheduled for 1 pm Central Time today, the enemy of the Iranian people is the enemy of the American people and their once vibrant Constitutional Republic. Take note, the Pompeos and Dubowitzes of the world. Your days are numbered. You have been weighed and found wanting. Your end is assured.


The Crucified and Risen Christ is Victorious Over Satanic Powers and Principalities Operating Through World Governments. (Ephesians 6)


Postscript: Minutes after this posting was completed, I learned from Press TV and the UK Guardian of the horrific detention of Iranian-American Dr. Sirous Asgari at an ICE facility in Alexandria, Louisiana after being acquitted of all federal charges in a court of law related to alleged stealing of trade secrets while a professor at a university in Ohio. Read these links. As I have said, a criminally oriented government abroad is the government next to visit its vile acts upon its own citizens at home.





Book Review: The Real Lincoln (2000)


The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War

by Dr. Thomas J. DiLorenzo

Prima Publishing: Roseville, California

333 pages, 2002

ISBN: 0-7615-3641-8

Reviewed by Mark Dankof for Mark Dankof’s America

Re-post and re-publishing permission granted with attribution.


While I have considered the preservation of the constitutional power of the General Government to be the foundation of our peace and safety at home and abroad, I yet believe that the maintenance of the rights and authority reserved to the states and to the people, not only are essential to the adjustment and balance of the general system, but the safeguard to the continuance of a free government. I consider it as the chief source of stability to our political system, whereas the consolidation of the states into one vast republic, sure to be aggressive abroad and despotic at home, will be the certain precursor of that ruin which has overwhelmed all those that have preceded it. 

–General Robert E. Lee to Lord Acton on December 15th, 1866 quoted in The Real Lincoln (p. 268)


General Robert E. Lee warned of a Despotic American Empire at Home and Abroad.


            The former Iranian Ambassador to the United Nations, Fereydoun Hoveyda, has recently brought his considerable historical knowledge of ancient and modern Persia to the task of writing about the role of mythology in explaining facets of Iranian cultural, political, and religious life to the uninitiated in the Western world.

            Hoveyda’s invaluable contribution in this regard is matched in the American political and cultural context by Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo, professor of economics in the Sellinger School of Business and Management at Loyola College in Maryland, in the latter’s salient, prescient analysis of the Presidential reign of Abraham Lincoln and his prosecution of an American Civil War in The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War.


General Robert E. Lee foresaw it all.  The end of the War Between the States was the end of Republic and the beginning of Empire.

            DiLorenzo’s analysis of Lincoln, accompanied by copious historical documentation, shatters the mythology surrounding the 16th President’s motives and agenda in pursuing the War Between The States. The author provides convincing evidence for Lincoln’s overt racism as expressed in his documented views on racial supremacy as manifested in his desire to colonize all American blacks outside the continental United States (p. 4); that Lincoln’s views were matched by a palpable majority in the North who utilized such tools as state constitutional amendments to prohibit the emigration of black people into Northern states like the President’s home state of Illinois (p. 4); and that Lincoln’s war which killed 620,000 Americans [equivalent to 5 million deaths in 2002 population numbers and percentages] and destroyed 40 percent of the American economy, was a singularly terrible, unjustified conflict given the proven success in the 19th century of the peaceful end to slavery through the policy of compensated emancipation (p. 4). DiLorenzo duly notes that, “Between 1800 and 1860, dozens of countries, including the entire British Empire, ended slavery peacefully; only in the United States was a war involved (p. 4).”


            What then, does The Real Lincoln lay out as the actual road map for understanding the war and the accompanying strategy and psyche of Abraham Lincoln in resorting to armed force against the Southern states? In his tome, DiLorenzo underscores the mythological President’s political and moral failure in pursuing the bloodshed of fellow countrymen with an evil, unnecessary, coercive methodology. The author insists that the prevailing world-wide trends between 1800-1860 would have resulted in the irenic end to the institution of slavery by; 1) compensated emancipation; 2) an encouraged advance of the industrial revolution in the South with capital-intensive agriculture and manufacturing (p. 277); and 3) the inevitable furtherance of Enlightenment philosophy in the American mind and culture, a philosophy which in the end game would have been ideologically incompatible with the continuation of the institution, as had been the case throughout the British empire (pp. 276-277). For the Loyola College Professor of Economics, the real Lincoln agenda in the War Between the States is located in the fact that:


. . .the War Between the States so fundamentally transformed the nature of American government. Before the war, government in America was the highly decentralized, limited government established by the founding fathers. The war created the highly centralized state that Americans labor under today. The purpose of American government was transformed from the defense of individual liberty to the quest for empire. . . . Lincoln thought of himself as the heir to the Hamiltonian political tradition, which sought a much more centralized governmental system, one that would plan economic development with corporate subsidies financed by protectionist tariffs and the printing of money by the central government. . . . It was Lincoln’s real agenda. . . . Henry Clay’s “American System.” For his entire political life Lincoln was devoted to Clay and Clay’s economic agenda. The debate over this economic agenda was arguably the most important political debate during the first seventy years of the nation’s existence. It involved the nation’s most prominent statesmen and pitted the states’ rights Jeffersonians against the centralizing Hamiltonians (who became Whigs and, later, Republicans). The violence of war finally ended the debate in 1861. . . . A war was not necessary to free the slaves, but it was necessary to destroy the most significant check on the powers of the central government: the right of secession. (Introduction)


Robert E. Lee foresaw the ravages of an American Empire based on a pack of lies, militarism, and a despotic domestic police state.

            Chapter 5 demonstrates that this right of secession was rooted in the proper understanding of the Declaration of Independence as a “Declaration of Secession” from England, with the New England Federalists attempting to secede from the Union after Jefferson’s election in 1800, for more than a decade. DiLorenzo documents the pre-1861 assumption of most commentators in both North and South that states had the inherent right to secede from the Union as a last check on the excesses of an arbitrary, centralized Federal government, buttressing his case with telling quotations from Jefferson, John Quincy Adams (a Unionist), de Tocqueville, and even Alexander Hamilton. It was Lincoln, however, who invented the preposterous theory that the Federal government created the states, which were therefore not sovereign entities, subsequently waging a war to establish his deliberate inversion of the Constitutional intent of the founders. The Federal government became by force of the sword an involuntary Union, “the master, rather than the servant, of the people–especially once it imposed military conscription and income taxation on the population (p. 264).” Thus, the “American System” of Henry Clay began its implementation in earnest with Abraham Lincoln, creating a Leviathan Central State of oppressive taxation and regulation at home, and imperialistic expansion abroad, that has been unchecked ever since.


“Democracy” in the American Empire, Abe Lincoln Style.

            The Real Lincoln also underscores the importance of the individual tenets of the Clay/Lincoln program of economic centralization in the destruction of a Constitutionally informed American Federalism, especially in protectionism; government control of the money supply through a nationalized banking system; and government subsidies for railroad, shipping, and canal-building enterprises (p. 54). DiLorenzo summarizes the economic agenda end game of the “American System” by quoting Murray Rothbard’s classic equation of the former with:

. . . namely, mercantilism. . . . ‘which reached its height in the Europe of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries,’ [and] was ‘a system of statism which employed economic fallacy to build up a structure of imperial state power, as well as special subsidy and monopolistic privilege to individuals or groups favored by the state.’ (56)


            This economic system, presided over by the man William Lloyd Garrison tagged as the “President of African Colonization,” (p. 19) dovetailed perfectly with the rest of the 16th President’s statist agenda, implemented with a methodology that effectively mixed duplicity with coercion. Seen with these lenses, the “liberator of the slaves” becomes the manipulative issuer of an Emancipation Proclamation which liberated blacks only in rebel-held territories after Lee’s defeat of Burnside at Fredericksburg in December of 1862. Lincoln’s Proclamation issued exemptions for a list of enumerated states, and was designed to liberate only those slaves which could be utilized for servile insurrection on isolated plantations (pp. 42-43), while concurrently discouraging European trade and political support for the Confederacy (pp. 37-38). The Great Economic Centralizer may also be fully credited for:

. . .launching a military invasion without the consent of Congress; suspending habeas corpus; imprisoning thousands of Northern citizens without trial for merely opposing his policies; censoring all telegraph communication and imprisoning dozens of opposition newspaper publishers; nationalizing the railroads; using Federal troops to interfere with elections; confiscating firearms; and deporting an opposition member of Congress, Clement L. Vallandigham, after he opposed Lincoln’s income tax proposal during a Democratic Party rally in Ohio. . . . In addition to abandoning the Constitution, the Lincoln administration established another ominous precedent by deciding to abandon international law and the accepted moral code of civilized societies and wage war on civilians. (6)

            In this latter regard, DiLorenzo reminds the reader of the scorched earth policies of Sheridan, Grant, and William Tecumseh Sherman, not only in the War Between the States but in the post-war eradication of the Plains Indians in acts of mass murder designed to pave the way for the government’s transcontinental railroads; the exploitative policies of Lincoln’s successors in the Reconstructionist South of 1865-77; and the subsequent imperialistic policies abroad of McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and their successors in the furtherance of American Empire. In each case, The Real Lincoln makes a compelling case that in an epochal sense, it all began with the methods and motives of America’s 16th President.


If You’re for Republic, not Empire, You Certainly Are.

            Finally, the informed reader of The Real Lincoln will be duly impressed with the ominous parallels between the Republican 16th President and the Republican 43rd Chief Executive of the United States. It is George W. Bush who has gone beyond Lincoln’s national centralized banking in facilitating globalist financial structures like the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, The North American Free Trade Agreement the World Trade Organization, GATT, and the proposed Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (managed trade, not free trade). It is Mr. Bush who has increased Federal spending beyond that of his predecessor for a variety of agencies, including new monies for the Federal Department of Education. It is Mr. Bush who has prosecuted an offensive war against a foreign power without the necessary consent and authorization of Congress according to Article 1, Section 8. Similarly, it is Mr. Bush whose Administration seeks, through the USA Patriot Act and the Domestic Security Enhancement Act (DSEA), the broadest authority ever given the Executive Branch of the Federal government to conduct warrantless searches and seizures of homes and businesses; to hold citizen suspects in custody without legal representation for unspecified periods of time; and to pursue the broadest expansion of electronic surveillance operations in the history of the United States. And where 19th century British mercantilism is concerned, Murray Rothbard’s textbook definition of it as government’s special subsidy and monopolistic privilege to individuals or groups favored by the state, must be applied in spades to the monarchial reign of King George W. Bush and his cabal of advisers influenced by international bankers, oil and natural gas consortiums, insurance and media conglomerates, and the much vaunted Israeli Lobby. The 19th century Credit Mobilier and Union Pacific and Central Pacific Railroads are now the domain of UNOCAL; Halliburton Oil; Kellogg, Brown, and Root; Trieme Partners; Exxon/Mobil; Chevron; Paladin Capital; the Carlyle Group; and the American Israeli Political Action Committee (AIPAC). And in this merger of the denizens of the Central State with multinational economic conglomerates and globalist structures of impending World Government, the American military in most Lincolnesque fashion now serves as the janissaries of coercive interests totally at odds with historic American Federalism and those the latter was designed to protect.


Mark Dankof on Syria, Iran, and Edward Snowden for Tehran’s Light House Viewer News

Mark Dankof in Washington, D. C. in November of 2011

Mark Dankof in Washington, D. C. in November of 2011

Mark Dankof sits down with Mohsen Abdollahi, Director of the Americas Desk of the Tehran-based Light House Viewer News to answer questions on Iran, Syria, and Edward Snowden, in a September interview destined for translation from American English to Persian, Arabic, and Spanish for a wider global audience.


Question: With a new government in Iran, is there going to be any compromise on the Iranian nuclear issue? If any compromise is reached, how are the sanctions going to be eased or eliminated entirely?

Mark Dankof:  There will ultimately be no compromise.  The reason is that the question of Iranian possession of nuclear power is not the issue for the Zionist-oriented West and Israel.  The issue is regime change in Iran, and bringing to power in Tehran a regime that will be absolutely compliant with anything that the United States and Benjamin Netanyahu desire.  Israel does not want any strong regional power in the Middle East other than itself; Israel wants to continue its illegal and genocidal policies in Palestine, Gaza, the West Bank, and throughout the region unimpeded, including an eventual expansion of Eretz Yisrael (“Greater Israel“) into the absolute control of every bit of territory from the Nile River to the Tigris/Euphrates River and north of the Litani River, as modern Zionism has advocated since the late 19th century.  The International Central Bankers and the Multi-National Energy Consortiums also want Iran carved up for their own purposes, in effect to bring that country into full membership in what some of us call the global New World Order (NWO).

The Marxist Mujahedeen-e-Khalq (MEK):  A Long Track Record of Spilling Innocent Blood.  And now the Friend of the Israeli Mossad and American Neo-Conservatives.

The Marxist Mujahedeen-e-Khalq (MEK): A Long Track Record of Spilling Innocent Blood. And now the Friend of the Israeli Mossad and American Neo-Conservatives.

As for sanctions, the sanctions on Iranian banks, oil companies, and other entities are part of a war on Iran that has already been declared by the Zionist State and its allies and puppets in Western government and media.  They are a part of a continuum of aggressive actions that has included using the Mujahedeen-e-Khalq (MEK/MKO) to assassinate Iranian scientists on Iranian soil, that has employed Global Corporate Media to falsify the character of the Iranian nuclear program and the motives of its government and people, and that has violated Iranian airspace and borders with every conceivable brand of clandestine black operation imaginable.  Finally, the present war with Syria being conducted by the United States, Israel, and the Saudi-led Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) in conjunction with Turkey, is the latest phase in this illegitimate aggression.  This is where Zionism, Banks, Energy Consortiums, and Sunni Wahabic animosity toward Shia Islam coincide in mutual interest in a most evil coalition.

Uncle Sam Wants You to Die for Amerikka, or is it Israel?

Uncle Sam Wants You to Die for Amerikka, or is it Israel?

Question: What are your ideas about placing sanctions on Iran while the Iranian nuclear program is peaceful and non-weaponized? Are there any other reasons for applying such sanctions?

Mark Dankof:  As I said before, the sanctions are part of a continuum of actions designed to bring about the destruction of the present government in Iran and its replacement with an entity that would do the bidding of the United States, Netanyahu, the International Banks, and the Energy Companies.  The fact is that the last National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) prepared by the  16 intelligence agencies of the United States contradicted Israeli propaganda completely about the character of the Iranian nuclear program, even as Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), and has the provable right as a signatory to this treaty to have a peaceful nuclear program complete with the right to enrich uranium.  Iranian has been subjected to repeated inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), even as the known Zionist possession of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons, and Israel’s non-signatory status to the NPT and non-submission to IAEA inspections, is a matter of record.

Question: Many human rights advocates worldwide observe that the main target of sanctions are ordinary people; how does the American government justify using sanctions against such people, even as it claims otherwise?

Mark Dankof:  I’ll give you the short version, the version that I discussed on camera with Marzieh Hashemi of Press TV last evening in a 5 minute segment.  The United States government will legitimize anything that involves the interests of the Zionist regime, up to and including criminality.  If Israel wants it, they get it.  That is the ongoing position of the American government for decades.  The last American President with any degree of independence from the Israeli Lobby was John F. Kennedy.  In 1963, we now know that Kennedy was trying to get Prime Minister David Ben Gurion of Israel to agree to American and international inspection of the Dimona nuclear plant in the Negev desert that Ben Gurion falsely told Kennedy was merely a water desalinization project.  Kennedy was also known to have contemplated eventual dissolution of the Federal Reserve Banking system and the return of American monetary policy to the Congress of the United States, where the Constitution of the United States and the Founding Fathers of America put it.  Your readers may duly note that Mr. Kennedy did not live to pursue the realization of these objectives.  Michael Collins Piper’s book, Final Judgment, translated into a number of languages and sold globally, may well tell them why.

Philip Giraldi of the Council for the National Interest: Israel Spying and Technology Theft is Threatening American National Security.

Philip Giraldi of the Council for the National Interest: Israel Spying and Technology Theft is Threatening American National Security.

The Government of the United States does not care about average people anywhere, including Iran, Palestine, and within its own American borders.  The bottom line is that the American government and corporate news media are totally sold out to Zionist interests, as has been demonstrated time and time again by reputable scholars and political commentators.  This control is so monolithic that even when Israel is committing crimes against the United States, like the Lavon Affair, Israel’s attack on the USS Liberty on June 8, 1967 [a deliberate attack according to Secretary of State Dean Rusk; Admiral Thomas Moorer, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under Ronald Reagan; and Richard Helms, former head of the Central Intelligence Agency and former American Ambassador to Iran], the PROMIS espionage scandal, and the Jonathan Pollard/AIPAC spy cases of more recent years, no serious repercussions for Israel ever occur.  In the case of the AIPAC spy case, Congresswoman Jane Harman of California, whose late husband owned Newsweek magazine, was overheard in a wiretapped conversation with an Israeli agent, promising to use her influence to get charges dropped in the AIPAC spy case in exchange for her own appointment to the position of the Chair of the House Intelligence Committee.  Congressional Quarterly (GQ) had a major story on this at the time, but nothing ever happened to Harman, who should have been formally tried for treason, booted out of Congress, and imprisoned.  Why?  I believe you see the seriousness of my point, and what it means for you and me as “average people.”

Oh, yes, I forgot the infamous date of September 11, 2001.  I told your Kourosh Ziabari of the Fars News Agency sometime ago why I agree with Dr. Alan Zabrosky of the U. S. National War College that Israel was behind the 9-11 attacks in New York.  If your readers are interested, check out  “A Conversation with Mark Dankof on Israel and 9-11.”  This is just how deeply the cancer has metastasized.

What will be the next move of the Masters of the False Flag Operation?  "By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt do War."

What will be the next move of the Masters of the False Flag Operation? “By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt do War.”

And as for average people in Iran, the Jewish racial supremacist doctrine taught in the Talmud indicates that they are sub-human and do not possess the rights of “The Chosen People.”  This racist doctrine undergirds all of Zionist ideology, and discriminates equally against all of us, some more obviously than others.  Right now, the Palestinians, the folks in southern Lebanon, Syria, and Iran, are the most obvious victims with a dangerous and precarious position in the rifle crosshairs of the Israeli war machine–and the American war machine in the service of the Zionist cause.


Question: What is your opinion on the future outcome of the conflict in Syria? Is Congress going to let Obama strike Syria?

Your Congressmen and Senators will vote for War with Syria and Iran.  It's about their sponsors.

Your Congressmen and Senators will vote for War with Syria and Iran. It’s about their sponsors.

Mark Dankof:  I believe Obama will get his vote for war in the American Senate, by a wide margin, and in the House of Representatives by a lesser margin.  What is interesting is that some rabid pro-Zionist types like ex-U.S. Ambassador John Bolton; Danielle Pletkin of the American Enterprise Institute (AEI); and media voices like Michael Savage, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity, have either expressed outright opposition to the war with Syria, or serious reservations about pursuing it.  This tells me that even they see the risks and dangers, which include serious blowback against the United States in the Middle East, countermoves by Vladimir Putin and China against this illegal aggression against Syria, and most importantly, blowback against the Zionist shills in the American media and government by the people of the United States if they ever connect-the-dots on who is behind these irresponsible and reckless policiesThis latter factor is our only mutual hope, a terrible tragedy against the average people of the United States in all of this that causes them to rise up and put this Fifth Column out of business forever in their own country, and to reclaim their culture, economy, political independence, and extrication from senseless foreign wars that are not in their individual and national interest.  If it happens, it will not be pretty.  A terrible price will be extracted from the American people if they conduct their own fight against these tyrants, but freedom is never free.  What the goal is, as I said on Press TV yesterday, is the death of the American Empire, and the rebirth of the Old American Republic governed by the Constitution and the rule of law.  In other words, let’s eradicate the malignant influence of the Barney Franks, the Joseph Liebermans, the John McCains, and the Lindsey Grahams, and bring back the foundations of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Charles Lindbergh.  Only time and history will tell in regard to whether or not this will happen.  If it doesn’t happen, Americans with any decency and intelligence at all will have to become expatriates somewhere else.  This is how it is shaping up.

The Samson Option:  The Zionist State's Endgame for the Middle East and the World?

The Samson Option: The Zionist State’s Endgame for the Middle East and the World?

Question: Why did Obama decide to get the approval of Congress for attacking Syria? Why did he change his mind?

Mark Dankof:  Obama understands that the power of the Israeli Lobby in the United States has been unshakeable in getting its agenda undertaken by every American President since World War II, with the notable partial exceptions of Eisenhower and John Kennedy.  He has also acknowledged in his own words to the Israeli media on his last trip there that his own election to the United States Senate in Illinois, and the American Presidency itself, could not have happened without the support and funding of Jews in the United States and their respective lobbying groups.  The vast percentage of the money that flows into the Democratic Party coffers in the United States is Jewish money.  This is an absolute and provable fact.  So, on the one hand, he wants to do something in Syria to placate and appease his Jewish supporters and power brokers.

At the same time, he is enough of a political survivor to understand that the risks of attacking Syria, and the law of unintended consequences, are such that having a Congressional imprimatur on this lunacy will protect him from absorbing the blowback in isolation if things go wrong.  One also wonders if the man knows in his heart that this entire pathway is wrong, and has a secret wish to have a Congressional vote say “no,” to give him the political cover necessary to tell Netanyahu and his agents in the American government that the President cannot proceed without the political cover denied to him by a Congressional turndown.  This is a most fascinating crossroad we see the President approaching, and the Congress, before a fateful decision is made publicly.

Question: How can we understand the Obama decisions on Syria in the context of the ongoing debate in Washington on the wisdom of his policies? How does the debate on Syria compare to Congressional and Party debates on immigration policy, budget priorities and other items of concern to the American people?

Mark Dankof:  I would say that the present debate on Syria reveals the moral and political bankruptcy of both major political parties in the United States, and the inability of these corrupt parties to frame workable policies on a bipartisan basis on Syria, Middle Eastern policy generally, immigration policy, budget priorities, or healthcare.  The present system is possibly broken beyond repair, due to how elections are funded in the United States, the corrupt character of what Ray McGovern calls Establishment Corporate Media (ECM) in America, and the deficient character of an American public that struggles with a toxic synthesis of hopelessness and cynicism; an unwillingness or inability to read and consult responsible sources of information; and moral decadence and insatiable obsession with the targeted sexual decadence and perversion that represents the moral sewer system the culture of the United States in the last half century has come to embody.  For all of that, we may thank our Zionist Masters.


Question: With regard to the Obama trip to Russia in coming days, how much has the Edward Snowden/National Security Agency surveillance case impacted the American/Russian relationship?

Mark Dankof:  The Snowden case is just the icing on the cake in terms of a poisoning of the American-Russian relationship.  Pat Buchanan has an excellent essay on this from August 8th, 2013, entitled “Do We Want a Cold War II?” .  I will quote Buchanan directly for your readers:

“From 1989 to 1991, Mikhail Gorbachev agreed to let Eastern Europe go free and   withdraw his troops and tank armies back to the Urals. The Soviet Union was   allowed to dissolve into 15 nations. In three years, the USSR gave up an empire,   a third of its territory, and half its people.

“And it extended to us a hand of friendship.

“How did we respond? We pushed NATO right up to Russia’s borders, bringing in   Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Rumania, Bulgaria, even former Soviet republics   Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.

“European objections alone prevented us from handing out NATO war guarantees   to Ukraine and Georgia. Was this a friendly act?

“Would we have regarded post-Cold War Russian alliances with Cuba, Nicaragua,   Venezuela, and Mexico as friendly acts?

“To cut Moscow out of the Caspian Sea oil, we helped build a pipeline through   two former Soviet republics, Azerbaijan and Georgia, and, thence, under the   Black Sea to our NATO ally Turkey.

“In the Boris Yeltsin decade, the 1990s, U.S. hustlers colluded with local oligarchs   in looting Russia of her natural resources.

“In the past decade, the National Endowment for Democracy and its Republican   and Democratic subsidiaries helped dump over governments in Serbia, Ukraine   and Georgia, and replace them with regimes friendlier to us and more distant from Moscow.”

Pat Buchanan and Mark Dankof in San Antonio, Texas.  1995.

Pat Buchanan and Mark Dankof in San Antonio, Texas. 1995.

Question: Can we expect any change in Latin American, European and Russian perceptions and policies toward the United States  because of the Snowden case, especially with the revelations that the American government was involved in the wholesale electronic surveillance of the governments of these sovereign countries? What is the future of the bilateral relationship of these countries around the world with the United States?

Mark Dankof:  I am not sanguine about the bilateral relationship between the United States and any of the countries and governments your question alludes to.  There can be no question that our support for Zionist policies globally has had more to do with the decline in American popularity in recent years than any other single factor, and not simply in the Middle East and Central Asia.  As far as the Snowden NSA revelations are concerned, the real story has yet to be reported by the international or American media virtually anywhere:  that the NSA spying program, along with other American surveillance operations domestically and abroad, has a disproportionate number of companies and contractors connected to Israel officially involved in these lucrative enterprises and sinister efforts. This includes the burgeoning American Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which is a hotbed of money and activity within American borders for Israeli agents, arms brokers, and Israeli surveillance and security companies.  Your readers need to see English, Persian, Arabic, and Spanish translations of Dr. Philip Giraldi’s “Homeland Security Made in Israel.”

The bottom line is this:  this Fifth Column operating within the American homeland is not simply targeting Palestinians, Lebanese, Syrians, and Iranians.  They are provably targeting lawful dissenters from the Israelification of the American homeland.  We are all in mutual future danger.  You need to understand that the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith (ADL) in the United States is targeting lawful and legal American citizens exercising their First Amendment rights in criticizing Israel and Zionism.  I have been one of their targets in recent years, courtesy of Rabbi Aryeh Tuchman, the Director of the Library and Research Division of the ADL in New York City, as well as their Assistant Director of their Civil Rights Division.  The good Rabbi was doing all of this on an anonymous basis–until he got caught.  I’d like to close by sharing two articles with your readers.  One is “Mark Dankof’s Open Invitation to Rabbi Aryeh Tuchman of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith in New York:  Come Out of the Closet and Join Us.”  The other is “Mark Dankof Responds to Rabbi Tuchman of the ADL Regarding His Hit on Mark Glenn and Press TV.”

If things go way wrong, Edward Snowden and I may join many other patriotic Americans concerned about the rule of law in the same type of assault the ADL conducted against American dissidents protesting the policies of Franklin Roosevelt in 1944.

But this has been my calling, and will continue to be.  I suspect Mr. Snowden would say the same thing.

Mark Dankof in University of Texas/Austin colors on a frigid day in northern Idaho at Mark Glenn's family compound.  November, 2010.

Mark Dankof in University of Texas/Austin colors on a frigid day in northern Idaho at Mark Glenn’s family compound. November, 2010.

[Mark Dankof is a former 3rd Party Candidate for the United States Senate in the year 2000; he is an occasional contributor to the American Free Press of Washington, D. C. and Breaking All the Rules News (BATR).  His radio show, “Mark Dankof’s America,” is heard on The Ugly Truth radio network.  He is a frequent guest on Iran’s Press TV and has been interviewed by Kourosh Ziabari of Fars News Agency regarding Israel’s role in the September 11th, 2001 attacks in New York. Mr. Dankof resides in San Antonio, Texas, and is a Lutheran clergyman.]

Nov 7th is The Day After: Mark Dankof’s America on The Election and What it Means and Doesn’t Mean

Mark Dankof : Love Him or Hate Him, He’s All Yours on November 7th!!!!

Mark Dankof’s America is joined on Wednesday, November 7th, by Mark Glenn and the entire gang at The Ugly Truth to discuss the results of the American Presidential Election at least as known 24 hours later.  Join us for what you won’t hear on Establishment Corporate Media (ECM) radio!!!!

Warning to Michael Moore:  We’re going to “Cock-Punchboth Romney and Obama, and all those frontal lobotomy patients who voted for either of them.  . . .

Live air time is 1 pm Pacific/3 pm Central/4 pm Eastern/9 pm UTC [+6].

“T’was the night before elections, and all through the house…Jewish interests were scurrying to bring forth their louse…”

2012 Options: A Real Platform for the Real Right: But Is It Too Late?

Mark Dankof: An Honest American Asks, "Is it Too Late?"

     When I was a young person, the late William Colby once told me that a honest problem solver had to do three (3) things.

     The first involves defining the real problem at hand, isolating root causes and jettisoning red herrings.

     The second involves identifying the right sources and resources, utilizing their insights and wisdom while simultaneously eliminating the wrong sources and their deep freezing reservoir of penetratingly false analysis and deceptive solutions, ending only in a beeline to Sheol and outer darkness if followed because of fatally incurable myopia.

     The third involves literal intercessory prayer for the honest problem solver who believes that God and that option actually exist. It is an especially focused prayer.  One prays fervently that the magnitude of the problem and its enshrouding metastasis have not outstripped the abilities and options of the problem solvers, and the allotted time granted to the latter to solve the issues at hand.  Translation:  It may prove to be too late.

William E. Colby: Was April of 1996 an Accident? Or a Final Payback from the Angleton/Israel Connection?

     Time ran out for William Colby in April of 1996.  The various spins on his life and death range from the official version to alternative ones.

     And as James Petras’ latest missal suggests, time may also be running out for any semblance of solution to the crisis confronting honest and decent Americans being sucked into suffocating quicksand by dark forces and events threatening to comprehensively destroy both their individual lives and the Old Republic once governed by the great principles reaffirmed in the outcome of the American Revolutionary War.  That conflict and the Republic it produced would be clearly explained and justified by George Washington’s Farewell Address, Madison’s essays in The Federalist, the work and philosophy of Thomas Jefferson, and the later struggle of Andrew Jackson against Central Banking.

     It would then be tragically left to Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, and Franklin Delano Roosevelt to destroy the Old Republic and commence the frenzied goosestepping to an Empire rooted in Globalism, Imperialism, Militarism, International Central Banking, and support of World Zionism.  The Empire now gasps on life support and artificial respiration.  It must be understood that this is not bad news, but merciful news, both for the American people victimized by The Empire, as well as for the latter’s international victims, the latest obvious case being the Palestinians.

Mossad in America: What Did William Colby Know About the "Hidden Hand"?

     With that in mind, as another miserable Presidential election cycle beckons, I have been asked by a myriad number of readers and listeners to provide my take on what ails the American people, applying Bill Colby’s prescription of long ago for understanding causes and prescribing cures.

     The cause of the American malady is abundantly clear.  Our leadership and institutions have been co-opted by International Central Bankers, Transnational Corporate Interests, and the Israeli Lobby.  The result is an economic system deliberately rooted in spiraling debt, extortionist usury, profligate governmental spending, and the perpetually murderous utilization of the American military as a surrogate armed force being deployed abroad by the identified actors for their own economic and political gain at the expense of everyone else.  The interest of this evil coalition is the antithesis of that of the average American and his/her family, and that of the population of the planet as a whole.  In the case of Americans, the agenda is being falsely but effectively marketed by a news media owned and operated by these clearly enumerated interests, and which will employ the symbols of God, country, family, hearth, home, and community to sell the very policies  of a New World Order antithetical to the authentic Kingdom of God, a sovereign nation-state governed by the principles enshrined in the Constitution of the United States, and the underlying value system of those who hold them both dearly.  Simultaneously, these policies are ruthlessly devoted to the extermination of those who hold the values of The Old Republic to the breast, and who have failed to understand The Real Enemy and the methodology he effectively employs.  Rupert Murdoch and William Kristol  are but the tip of this media iceberg.

     The unmistakable cause of the American malady must be irrevocably uprooted and destroyed.  Identifying the players and their methods of operation is but the beginning of the achievement of the goal, not the endgame itself.  Bringing actual and meaningful change to bear in the presently disastrous course is imperative.  But how is this achieved in an electoral and political process owned and operated by those who control and manipulate money supply, interest rates, electoral outcomes up-and-down the ballot line, and the dissemination of information via Transnational Corporate Media (TCM)?

     If there is any hope for reversal of course, speed, and fortune by peaceful electoral means, it will begin with two (2) components at the outset.  First, the pivotal and encouraging displacement of Corporate Media by Alternative Media must continue its increase exponentially, to inform a wider segment of the domestic population of the United States as to the identity of The Real Enemy and the way in which he operates.  Responsible usage of alternative media must employ a variety of sources to obtain a kaleidoscope of the larger picture.  Michael Collins Piper of Final Judgment, Mark Glenn of The Ugly Truth, Paul Craig Roberts, Paul Sheldon Foote, Ellen Brown,, E. Michael Jones of Culture Wars, the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, Hassan El-Naijar’s Al, Lew, Michel Chossudovsky’s Global, Jon Basil Utley’s Americans Against Bombing, the Institute of Historical Review (IHR), Pravada, Philip Giraldi’s Council for the National Interest, Alison Weir’s If Americans Knew, Max Kaiser, and Iran’s Press TV, are but a great start on the replacement of agitation-propaganda with factual truth and an honest attempt at analysis.  The consultation of CNN, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Newsweek, Time, the Wall Street Journal, the Weekly Standard,, World Net Daily and all the other usual suspects, would only occur as an informed comparison of the honest sources with the latter consortium clearly in the employ of The Beast.

     If the Internet-driven Alternative Media explosion produces at least a few additional Americans who can still read and think given the right sources of consultation, all well and good.  But this must be followed by even the beginning of some semblance of success at the ballot box, as the second component of hope in both national and global recovery from the tentacles of The Beast.

     That can only take place by revolutionary change in the financing of American elections and candidates.  Absent the successful political disenfranchisement of Transnational Corporate Elites, International Central Bankers, and the Israeli Lobby by the eradication of the existence of their poisonous PAC money pipeline, ballot box change is impossibly and irrevocably hopeless.   This cash flow routinely pours carcinogenic snake oil not only into the two major political parties and the Congressional Districts and Presidential Primaries, but into Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs), media outlets, publishing houses, political consulting firms, and the frontmen of the establishment version of the Christian Right.  On this last note, San Antonio-based John Hagee’s reported $150 million dollar operation dedicated to fueling the Zionist cause and the size of his own bank account via Cornerstone Church and Christians United for Israel (CUFI), is only the best illustration of the infiltration of the hearts and minds of millions of deluded innocents by The Beast.  These innocents need to begin distinguishing sharks from minnows, and wolves from sheep.

     The reformation of the process must be followed by the collective enactment of the right policy prescriptions on a coherent, comprehensive basis.  What are these?

     Keeping in mind the identification of the core players and actors in the promotion of the metastasis of the already diagnosed cancer and its accompanying symptoms, a renaissance of the Old Republic must be accompanied by the end of Fractional Reserve Banking, the Direct Federal Income Tax, and the existence of the Federal Reserve Board and its control of monetary policy since 1913.  Participation in the IMF, World Bank, the Import-Export Bank, and related financial institutions of the Globalist Cabal would also go. The eternal cessation of the employment of the American military in endless foreign wars of intervention unrelated to true national interest is a critical and accompanying ingredient in this resurrection of the Old Republic and the well being of its people.  A corollary American withdrawal from NATO would be a part of this particular reassertion of the doctrine of America First, much to the delight of both our own citizens and a global population sick of endless death and destruction devoid of moral justification and context.  Globalist trade treaties like NAFTA, GATT, WTO, and FTAA would be tossed overboard.  Economic policy would center in the revitalization of the manufacturing sector, not its deliberate euthanization and export.  Israel’s control of American foreign policy in Palestine, the Persian Gulf, and Central Asia would be expunged.  Israeli domestic involvement in the institutions of the United States ranging from Congressional committees, American intelligence agencies, telecommunication firms, and the Pentagon and the Department of Homeland Security, to NGOs, the media,  and assorted religious charlatans, would be exposed and deep-sixed forever.  Unconstitutional use of Executive Orders by Chief Executives would be met with Articles of Impeachment, and the Congressional defunding of military expeditions not sanctioned by Article I, Section 8.

     There is only one problem with this picture.  Consider the presently moribund state of campaign finance law; the still powerful and insidious role of Corporate Media; the dearth of effective 3rd party options; Congressional corruption; Israeli influence both overt and covert in the American military and intelligence communities; and the demoralizing absence of acceptable Presidential candidates save the possible exception of the GOP’s Ron Paul (R-TX).  He most certainly will not be nominated by the Republican Party.  If that presumption is proven erroneous, a President-Elect Paul would discover the complete absence of the existence of any support in the Congress and Senate, and the deliberate subversion of his best intentions by the internationalist-oriented institutions that presently prevail.  Even worse, the ominous spectre of future False Flag Operations (FFO) is ever-present, ranging from new versions of 9-11 and Pearl Harbor to another Dealey Plaza.  The bets of The Beast look eminently covered.

     The probability of a False Flag Operation (FFO) increases with the potential of a UN General Assembly vote in September recognizing an independent Palestinian state,  the burgeoning impatience of the Israeli Lobby with the perceived reluctance of at least some in Washington for launching preemptive military action against Iran, the reduction of Israel’s influence in the Middle East and Central Asia with the unfolding of the Arab Spring, the continued plummeting of American and international economic fortunes, and the real prospect of a new level of domestic discontent in the United States and Europe turning into either targeted civil disobedience or overt violence.  The FFO would serve two (2) distinct purposes; the diversion of millions from the task of identifying the source of their respective countries’ ills is one.  The substitution of the targeting of their wrath against the real culprits with that of an illegitimate wholesale assault on a deliberately demonized and falsely identified adversary is the other.  These purposes come full circle to reinforce the power of the forces pivotal in the deathgrip of the reign of The Beast.

The Samson Option: The "Ace in the Hole" for the Beast and Counterfeit Israel?

     And where the full circle phenomenon is concerned, writer and reader return to the third component of the roadmap of William Colby for problem solvers.  The definitive question is posed once more:  have the magnitude of the problem and its enshrouding metastasis outstripped the abilities and options of the problem solvers, and the allotted time granted to the latter to solve the issues at hand?  Is it too late?

     Bill Colby’s demise on the Patuxent River of Maryland in a late night plunge in April of 1996 into the depth of its turbulent, life-ending brew may never be satisfactorily explained.  The cause will remain eternally elusive and the source of endless speculation.  One thing is not in doubt.  It is too late to alter the events which ultimately led to his death,  which in turn provided the final punctuation mark on his life and the temporal destiny which accompanied its unfolding end.  His fate in this latter regard was irrevocably sealed 15 long years ago.  In that respect, it is    tempting to see his life and death as an indisputable and striking metaphor of a Final Verdict on the American Empire conclusively reached light years ago.

     If historical process and Divine Providence have vetoed the possibility of a return of the Old Republic subsequent to demise of The Empire, denizens of the Real Right have but three (3) uncertain options of dubious value.

     The first is a continuation of ineffective and purely symbolic protest within the existing conditions and parameters of a rigged American electoral process.  Lack of money, restrictive ballot access laws, and zero access to Corporate Media coverage guarantee failure.  The history of the Constitution Party, the Reform Party, the American Independent Party, and the Libertarian Party underscore this inevitable outcome.

     The second is a definitive resort to a more aggressive and targeted civil disobedience, and a possible evolution into the overt advocacy and use of violence as an instrument of populist counterrevolution.  This option carries its own hazards, including the threat of arrest, incarceration, torture, death, and the strong possibility of ultimate failure second only to the prospects for the first option of symbolic electoral protest within the confines of the charade presented by a political process co-opted by those who clearly own and administer its pre-arranged and guaranteed outcomes.  There are two other compelling considerations which argue against this choice.  As is the case in many revolutions and counterrevolutions involving violence and loss of life, there is no guarantee regarding who and what would replace the existing system and its power elite.  For the Christian, there is the added burden of attempting to reconcile the employment of violence in the attempted achievement of temporal political gain with Christ’s ethical mandates and His conception of the eternal character of the Kingdom of God.  This last imperative is decisive in my own rejection of revolutionary violence as both a realistic and moral option for consideration.

     Finally, there is the third and final option before the Eschaton.  Some on the Real Right have suggested it as a fallback alternative:  it involves the short or long-term exile of the disenfranchised American in a quiet life of expatriation abroad.  This begs the question of where an acceptable and accessible alternative might exist.  It also involves the crossing of an intellectual, emotional, and spiritual Rubicon not possible for many, and a particularly daunting task even for those capable of eventually doing so.

     In the case of the latter group, the discovery of a viable alternative is clearly the first task at hand.  Is there such a place?  What about a meaningful job?  Language hurdles?  Cultural assimilation? Health care? Low-key religious freedom?  The logistics of an overseas move?

     Let there be no mistake.  For those ready to consider this third alternative, intellectual, spiritual, and psychological acknowledgment of the death of a beloved country is as painful as the identical journey traveled in the passage beyond time of a parent, spouse, loved one, or friend.  The acknowledgment and acceptance of the reality of such an event will not paralyze the will.  Nor will it poison and pollute the heart, the soul, and the mind.  It will focus them in the renewal of galvanizing action, commitment, and reaffirmation of faith.  This is only possible within a framework which continues to acknowledge even the possibility of temporal hope yet future, and the potential for its rediscovery in a new venue.  This profile will be accompanied by the ability to accept an element of risk, and the vicissitudes of a life ready to meet new challenges and tribulations in the next chapter in time.

     There is one final and soundly foolproof recommendation for my readers and listeners.  Don’t be canoeing late into the night on the Patuxent River in Maryland.  Washing up on shore is not the 4th option.  . . .

A Beautiful Scene

The Rainbow as a Sign of Hope and Renewal

Mark Dankof on The Ugly Truth: November 19th



Mark Dankof in San Antonio. Summer 2010.



Mark Dankof joins Mark Glenn and Bob Tuskin  on The Ugly Truth to discuss Gordon Duff’s latest article, The Plot to Destroy the United States

Click here to listen.

Written by Mark Dankof

November 20, 2010 at 9:22 pm

Mark Dankof on The Ugly Truth on November 17th

Mark Dankof in San Antonio. Summer 2010.


Mark Dankof joins Mark Glenn on The Ugly Truth  to discuss Israel’s clean sweep of the American off-year elections, and the American bribe to the Zionist State of 20 F-35 aircraft to the tune of $3 billion, in exchange for Israel’s “90-day freeze” on illegal settlements.

Watch the incoming Congressional appointments in particular—Eric Cantor (R-VA) as the new House Majority Leader; Ilena Ros Lehtinen (R-FL) as chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee; and Peter King (R-NY) as chair of the House Homeland Security Committee. And follow the trail of the money.

Click here to listen.

Written by Mark Dankof

November 20, 2010 at 9:11 pm

Mark Dankof joins Mark Glenn’s Friday “The Ugly Truth” podcast

leave a comment »


Mark Dankof adds to his radio gigs by becoming a regular on Mark Glenn’s Friday edition of The Ugly Truth Podcast available online.  See the show description below: 

The Ugly Truth Podcast March 19, 2010

The Ugly Truth podcast welcomes the one and only Mark Dankof of as a regular to its Friday program. This week’s discussion includes fromer Green Beret commanding officer Joe Cortina and a fascinating discussion about VP Joe Biden’s recent trip to Israel.

Controlled Opposition: The Tea Party Turds and the House of Rothschild’s Coming War with Iran

with 12 comments






I feel sorry for Tiger Woods. Why are we talking about this when we’re sending 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan?  You’ve got this history-changing event going on and we’re talking about Tiger’s private life and golf injuries.  He’s being used as a diversion and it just drives me crazy.”

Mel Gibson in the UK Daily Mail, 2010

And I, Daniel, fainted, and was sick certain days; afterward I rose up, and did the king’s business; and I was astonished at the vision, but none understood it.”

The Biblical prophet, Daniel, chapter 8, verse 27

     The March 2nd Republican primary in Texas is now history.  The showcase event was the gubernatorial contest, where Globalist par excellence and Israeli lobby asset, Rick Perry, otherwise known as Mr. NAFTA Superhighway, defeated fellow central banking icon Kay Bailey Hutchison.  Populist, paleo insurgent Debra Medina received 18% of the ballots cast, cause for crowing among the remnant of the shrinking Paul-Buchanan wing of the GOP in the Lone Star State. 

     Two salient facts continue to underscore the ongoing ideological bankruptcy of the Republican Party in Texas, as well as nationally.  First, Medina’s vote totals remind the perceptive that 82% of “conservatives”  in the Texas gubernatorial race placed their imprimatur on two candidates symbolizing the Neo-Conservative hijacking of the electoral process in the GOP.  The Bush family, the Carlyle Group, and AIPAC are surely smiling in concert.

     But more importantly, the 18% who voted for Debra Medina, are in many cases largely clueless as to who and what is really behind the demise of their country, and their Party.

     This cluelessness apparently includes Mrs. Medina herself.  Like 2008 Presidential candidate, Ron Paul, Mrs. Medina attempted to finesse the 911 Truth Movement question posed to her by Glenn Beck on Fox News, and to avoid an aggressive attack upon the Israel First Neo-Conservatives who have hijacked the Republican Party.

     This is clearly a mistake, especially in light of the deliberate kidnapping of the Tea Party movement by the same suspects who have now moved into fourth gear in their promotion of an American/Israeli preemptive military attack on Iran.  Sarah Palin’s jingoistic keynote address at the recent Nashville conclave of deluded patriots underscores the gravity of the situation, both for an American conservative movement infiltrated by Tay-Sachs disease, and for the nation as a whole.

    My friend, Victor Thorn, described the sickening scene in Nashville for the March 1st American Free Press.  Before Palin’s Likudnik address, Thorn describes how the convention meal was blessed by Laurie Cardoza-Moore, president of the Christian-Zionist organization, Proclaiming Justice to the Nations.  Moore proclaimed, “If we do not defend the United States, who will defend Israel?  I would like to think that Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu is watching tonight.  And I want Bibi Netanyahu to know that the Tea Party nation is going to stand strong for Israel.”

     Someone like Debra Medina or Ron Paul needs to engage in an ideological frontal assault on this transparent, palpable garbage, with no punches pulled.  Where are these people when the country and the world are now on the edge of the precipice? 

     Try this one on for size.  What would have transpired in Nashville if someone with access to podium as a scheduled speaker had said something  on the order of the following?

     “Ladies and gentlemen, why is the domestic and foreign policy of the modern American conservative movement and the Republican party being defined by a view of Biblical prophecy unheard of until the 19th century, and largely promoted worldwide by the House of Rothschild’s distribution of the Scofield Reference Bible through its Oxford University Press?  Why are we in an alliance with a nation that has repeatedly committed crimes against the United States, including the Lavon Affair, Mossad involvement in the Kennedy assassination, the premeditated attack on the USS Liberty in June of 1967, the Pollard spy case, participation with Communist China in the theft of American nuclear secrets at Los Alamos through the PROMIS affair, and the more recent Ben Ami Kadish and AIPAC/Rosen/Weissman spy cases?

     “Why are we in an alliance as American conservatives with a domestic Jewish lobby which has militantly supported and financed the radical feminist, abortion, and homosexual lobbies most of us are sworn to oppose?

     “Why are we, as a pro-life movement, committed to policies of genocide against the Palestinians and the advocacy of the mass murder of Iranians, at the behest of an ‘ally’ which is the chief nuclear, biological, and chemical military power in the Middle East, and a non-signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) signed, however, by Iran?

     “And why, pray tell, are people here today in Nashville, talking about recovering American domestic liberty, in the context of ongoing obeisance to the chief players in a central banking cabal which has handed to us the direct federal income tax, the Federal Reserve Board, $13 trillion in national debt, and every globalist trade treaty that has destroyed American sovereignty and the manufacturing sector of our economy?   Is Bernard Madoff going to show up next year as a Tea Party keynote speaker?

     “And are Sarah Palin, Dick Armey, William Kristol, Mary Parker Lewis, Alan Keyes, Lou and Phillip Sheldon, Connie Hair, Judson Phillips, Mark Skoda, and Andrew Breitbart concerned that Israeli intelligence is promoting agitation-propaganda through the Rupert Murdoch News Corp chain designed to begin a Third World War?

     “Frankly, ladies and gentlemen, there is only one word to describe these activities on the part of those who claim to speak for America, its Constitution, and its people, but who have been bought off by what I have just described.  That word is treason.”

     Nashville clearly would have exploded.  It should have.  And the longer America First patriots delay the exposure of the Trojan Horse within the gates that should have transpired in Tennessee, the greater likelihood of the destruction of the Republic at the hands of the House of Rothschild, and the envelopment of the planet in the flames of a Third World War, courtesy of the Neo-Conservative dream of a “Clash of Civilizations.”

     One clear voice of reason in this madness is Philip Giraldi, former CIA station chief in Turkey, CIA counterterrorism official from 1976-1992, and Middle Eastern consultant for Pat Buchanan’s The American Conservative.  In his recent post for entitled, “Many Voices Calling for War with Iran,” Palin’s Nashville Tea Party appearance is sadly chronicled.  And had anyone in Nashville read Giraldi’s critique of last December 14th’s Times of London story on the Iranian nuclear program, neatly summarized in Gareth Porter’s “US Intelligence Found Iran Nuke Document Was Forged, ” they would have found the key paragraphs which encapsulate what has happened to their movement, and their country.

     “The Rupert Murdoch chain has been used extensively to publish false intelligence from the Israelis and occasionally from the British government,” Giraldi said.

     “The Times is part of a Murdoch publishing empire that includes the Sunday Times, Fox News and the New York Post. All Murdoch-owned news media report on Iran with an aggressively pro-Israeli slant.”

     Fox News really digs Sarah Palin, Dick Armey, William Kristol, John Bolton, William Kristol and Company.

     Get the picture, Tea Party Turds?