A Conversation with Kourosh Ziabari and Fars News Agency: Mark Dankof on Israel and the Anti-Islamic Media Attacks
“The not-so-Hidden Hand financing these unsavory efforts is aimed at provoking the ‘War of Civilizations’ fervently desired by the Zionists and their Neo-Conservative allies in the West. This War of Civilizations has three objectives. The first is the expansion of the Zionist State of Israel’s borders to those of ancient Israel’s at the time of King David as told in the Old Testament,” said Mark Dankof in an exclusive interview with Fars News Agency.
Dankof believes that Christians and Muslims are equally the victims of a Zionist-engineered project to disparage their religious beliefs and dominate their intellectual resources.
He says that the American public should be given an opportunity to make a close acquaintance of the hidden realities of Islam so that they may not fall in the trap of seeing Islam and Muslims through the eyes of extremist Zionists.
What follows is the text of Fars News Agency’s interview with Mark Dankof, American political commentator and host of Mark Dankof’s America on The Ugly Truth radio network.
Dr. E. Michael Jones of the Roman Catholic Culture Wars, is an outstanding academic source for documenting that when it comes to the Pornography Industry in the United States, the Abortion Industry, and the Gay Rights Movement, just to name three that come to mind, the disproportionate Jewish role in producing and financing these phenomena is demonstrable. Why? This is very easily explained and understood. A morally degenerate, passive, narcissistic population is most easily controlled and manipulated. When family structures and authority are undermined, when traditional religious and moral values are subverted and eliminated, the masses become self-absorbed and deluded. They become obsessed with sexual perversion, greed, and violent spectator sports. They lose their ability to think and to evaluate their individual situations, or the situation collectively faced by the society of which they are a part. They are especially ripe for diversion and manipulation by a Zionist-controlled media, what Ray McGovern tabs as “Establishment Corporate Media” (ECM). Narcissicism, passivity, and the inability to think create a population of malleable fools who accept the establishment version of what happened with Pearl Harbor, the Kennedy Assassination, the USS Liberty attack, 9-11, and the War on Terror, among other things. In the United States, the Jewish power and financial structures behind both of the major political parties is not acknowledged and understood by the average citizen. The $17 trillion dollar national debt and the $221 trillion unfunded liability for Social Security and Medicare is not discussed. The Israel Lobby’s power to bring the United States into a conflict with Iran that contains the potential to ignite World War III seems less important than the outcome of the last Monday Night Football game. It goes on and on. You get the idea. It is critical that what I am saying here be understood by Islamic peoples globally. Those of us like me, who are a part of the older Christian culture in the West, are trying to warn you in advance. This is the way the game is played. As Sun Tzu would have said, we need to understand the identity of the enemy, and his methods of operation. Only then can victory be achieved.
Kourosh Ziabari: The French government has banned demonstrations and rallies in protest at the anti-Islam movie “Innocence of Muslims.” Isn’t the right of holding demos and public protests a civil right which should be guaranteed based on the principles of human right and international law? Why did the French government which has always boasted of being committed to civil liberties take such a controversial decision?
Mark Dankof: There is but one answer for what has happened in France and elsewhere in the West. When it comes to Jewish and Zionist interests, there is no level playing field for those who protest their actions or their version of truth and morality. Demonstrations and protests are assumed in the West to be a part of the principles of human rights and international law only when these interests are not involved.
As but one example, questioning the establishment version of what happened in the so-called Holocaust in World War II, is a prosecutable offense punishable by disemployment, marginalization, and imprisonment in a number of Western countries. This is ridiculous. Whatever the merits and demerits of the arguments of the Revisionist academics and scholars in this area, the notion that mere advocacy of ideas should have this sort of outcome is indefensible.
There is another example in recent years. On October 16, 2004 President Bush signed into law the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act. It establishes a special department within the U.S. State Department to monitor “Global Anti-Semitism“, reporting annually to Congress.
As Ted Pike and Michael Collins Piper have documented it, this law and the department it created, have defined the following as “anti-Semitic” and worthy of Hate Crimes legislation and prosecution:
Any assertion “that the Jewish community controls government, the media, international business and the financial world” is anti-Semitic.
“Strong anti-Israel sentiment ” is anti-Semitic.
“Virulent criticism” of Israel’s leaders, past or present, is anti-Semitic.
According to the State Department, anti-Semitism occurs when a swastika is portrayed in a cartoon decrying the behavior of a past or present Zionist leader. Thus, a cartoon that includes a swastika to criticize Ariel Sharon’s brutal 2002 invasion of the West Bank, raining “hell-fire ” missiles on hapless Palestinian men, women and children, is anti-Semitic. Similarly, when the word “Zionazi ” is used to describe Sharon’s saturation bombing in Lebanon in 1982 (killing 17,500 innocent refugees), it is also “anti-Semitic.”
Criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature (especially the Talmud and Kabbalah) is anti-Semitic.
Criticism of the U.S. government and Congress for being under undue influence by the Jewish-Zionist community (including AIPAC) is anti-Semitic.
Criticism of the Jewish-Zionist community for promoting globalism (the “New World Order“) is anti-Semitic.
Blaming Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman crucifixion of Christ is anti-Semitic.
Diminishing the “six million” figure of Holocaust victims is anti-Semitic.
Calling Israel a “racist” state is anti-Semitic.
Asserting that there exists a “Zionist Conspiracy” is anti-Semitic.
Claiming that Jews and their leaders created the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia is anti-Semitic.
Making “derogatory statements about Jewish persons” is anti-Semitic.
Denying spiritually disobedient Jews the biblical right to re-occupy Palestine is anti-Semitic.
Alleging that Mossad was behind the 9/11 attack is anti-Semitic.
We might be forgiven for comparing the sacrosanct position of Jews and Zionists in the West as demonstrated by this American law, with the totally vulnerable position of Islamic and Christian peoples who protest against what is being done to them and to their cultures, in both the United States and Europe.